Preview

Avtomobil'. Doroga. Infrastruktura.

Advanced search

PHILOSOPHY OF TECHNOLOGY AS AN INDEPENDENT DIRECTION OF THE MODERN APPROACH TO KNOWLED

Abstract

The Article is devoted to the interdisciplinary field of knowledge – philosophy of technology as an independent direction of the modern approach of knowledge. In the modern world technology becomes the subject of study of a variety of disciplines, both technical, natural and social. The author emphasizes that the number of special technical disciplines is increasing, however, technology in general is not the subject of consideration of these disciplines. It is the task of philosophical consideration. The author considers the history of technology analysis as a phenomenon, the stage of technical optimism and technical pessimism, marks about more constructive approach of the discussion of issues of technique, function, technology. The author considers the technique as a means of resolving a certain human need. The author observes that the science investigates the cause, and the technique feasibility. Social philosopher Arnold Gelen, the author notes, was the first to consider the emergence of symbiosis of technology, industry and politics. And the main essence of the modern stage is the widespread introduction of information technologies – informatization of society. The author concludes that humanity is on the threshold of a new civilization, which will be fundamentally different from all the social formations that have existed so far.

About the Authors

Lyudmila P. Shipovskaya
MADI
Russian Federation
Dr. Sc., рrofessor


Anna N. Kramoleyeva
MADI
Russian Federation
undergraduate


References

1. Dahin A.V., Shchurov V.A. Apokalipsis tekhnicheskogo ob"ekta (Apocalypse of a technical facility), Nizhny Novgorod, Izd-vo Volgo-Vyatskoj akad. gos. sluzhby, 2007, 143 p.

2. Kolackij A.V. Filosofiya i politologiya: istoriya i sovremennost', Sbornik nauchnyh trudov, Moscow, MADI, 2017, pp. 46–56.

3. Lebedev O.T. Nauchno-tekhnicheskaya revolyuciya i filosofskie problemy formirovaniya inzhenernogo myshleniya (Scientific and technical revolution and philosophical problems of formation of engineering thinking), Moscow, Vysshaya shkola, 2011, 219 p.

4. Lenk H. Razmyshleniya o sovremennoj tekhnike (Reflections on modern technology), Moscow, Aspekt press, 2010, 184 p.

5. Shtraks M.G. Filosofiya i politologiya: istoriya i sovremennost', Sbornik nauchnyh trudov, Moscow, MADI, 2017, pp. 102–115.

6. URL: https://ebooks.adelaide.edu.au/k/kant/immanuel/k16p/

7. Petrovich G.P. Filosofiya tekhniki i tvorchestva P.K. Ehngel'mejera: Istoriko-filosofskij analiz (Philosophy of Technique and creativity P.K. Engelmeyer: Historical and philosophical analysis), Candidate sthesis, Ekaterinburg, 2002, 202 p.

8. URL: https://www.discred.ru/2018/03/01/poslanie-vladimira-putina-federalnomu-sobraniyu-2/

9. Podlesnyj S.V., Erfort Yu.A., Iskrickij V.M., Sushchenko D.G., Stadnik A.N. Istoriya inzhenernoj deyatel'nosti (Engineering history), Kramatorsk, Izd-vo Donbas. gos. mashinostroit. akad., 2010, 188 p.

10. Rozin V.M. Semioticheskie issledovaniya (Semiotic studies), Moscow, Per SEH, Saint-Petersburg, Universitetskaya kniga, 2001, 256 p.

11. Kosolapova E.A. Avtomobil'. Doroga. Infrastruktura, 2017, no. 1 (11), p. 34.


Review

Views: 408


ISSN 2409-7217 (Online)