Preview

Avtomobil'. Doroga. Infrastruktura.

Advanced search

Assessment of urban infrastructure for the movement of personal mobility devices: a case study of Belgorod city

Abstract

The article is devoted to assessing urban infrastructure for the movement of personal mobility devices (PMDs) using the city of Belgorod as a case study. The paper presents the results of an analysis of the city's central area, which enabled a quantitative assessment of the length of routes available for three transport categories: public transport, private motor vehicles, and PMDs. The study revealed that PMDs have access to the most extensive network of movement routes, including sidewalks, pedestrian paths, and bicycle lanes. The dynamics of PMD usage were examined across three city districts-northern, central, and southern-by day of the week and time intervals (morning, afternoon, evening). Based on field experiments, the widespread use of PMDs for trips up to 5 km (last-mile transport) was confirmed, with approximately 2,500 shared PMD units operating in the city supported by a distributed network of charging stations. The findings demonstrate the high transport potential of PMDs and their significant role in shaping sustainable and accessible urban mobility.

About the Authors

Anastasiya A. Yung
BSTU named after V.G. Shukhov
Russian Federation

Postgraduate Student



Anastasia G. Shevtsova
BSTU named after V.G. Shukhov

Doctor of Sciences (Technical), Associate Professor, Director of the Institute of Continuing Education and Professional Training, Higher Technological School of BSTU named after V.G. Shukhov



References

1. References

2. Nauras, S. (2019). Modern trends in the development of urban transport systems in the Russian Federation. Bulletin of the Plekhanov Russian University of Economics. Introduction. The Path to Science, 1(25), 88–96.

3. Beev, A. P., Merkulov, Y. A., Perfiliev, S. V., & Fedotov, N. I. (2015). Analysis and optimization of urban transport systems. Mathematical Methods in Engineering and Technology – MMTT, 7(77), 59–61.

4. Levitskaya, L. P., & Kretov, M. A. (2016). Strategy for the development of urban transport systems. Railway Economics, 9, 68–74.

5. Nemchinov, M. V., Khоlin, A. S., Fedorov, V. E., et al. (2009). Approaches to solving contemporary transport problems in large cities. Transport Construction, 1, 6–9.

6. Donchenko, V. V. (2023). Sustainable urban transport systems: A paradigm shift in planning and development of urban transport. Moscow: Radar Agency. 402 p.

7. Donchenko, V. V. (2005). Problems of ensuring sustainability of urban transport systems. Moscow: IKF "Katalog". 184 p.

8. Kostin, A. V., & Markin, A. V. (2021). Concept of an automated system for road traffic safety management on regional highways. Bulletin of NCRR, 4(50), 93–102.

9. Kurakina, E. V., & Sklyarova, A. A. (2020). Improving road safety within the "Road user – Vehicle – Road – Environment" system. Bulletin of Siberian State Automobile and Highway University, 17(4)(74), 488–499.

10. Ilyina, I. E., & Vitvitskiy, E. E. (2025). Indices for assessing road safety levels in regions. Bulletin of Siberian State Automobile and Highway University, 22(1)(101), 68–77.

11. Tolstoy, O. V., & Shevtsova, A. G. (2024). A method for improving safety on local roads. Scientific Portal of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia, 1(65), 60–68.

12. Shevtsova, A. G. (2021). Validity of Smeed's law under the Vision Zero programme implementation. World of Transport and Transport Machines, 4(75), 49–57.


Review

Рецензент: И.А. Новиков, д-р техн. наук, проф., БГТУ им. В. Г. Шухова

Views: 45

JATS XML

ISSN 2409-7217 (Online)