Problems of sustainable development of the National Park «Losiny Ostrov» in the conditions of anthropogenic impact
Abstract
The National Park «Elk Island» (NP LO), located in the Moscow metropolis, experiences significant anthropogenic pressure from the population and land transport. This article analyses the theoretical foundations of sustainable development of specially protected natural areas (SPNA) in the conditions of urbanisation, considering the key factors of anthropogenic pressure on the territory of «Losiny Ostrov». Based on the analysis of existing theoretical models and practical recommendations, a strategy to reduce the technogenic impact from traffic flows is proposed, aimed at preserving biodiversity and ecological integrity of the park.
About the Authors
Svetlana V. Kiseleva
MADI
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
undergraduate
Valentina V. Kozhukhova
Moscow Poly
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
senior lecturer
References
1. Informacionno-torgovyj portal «Lesnoj resurs». [Elektron. resurs]. URL: https://woodresource.ru (data obrashcheniya 26.01.2025).
2. Karpuhina N.V., Kiseleva V.V., Trifonova T.V. 2013. Ispol'zovanie GIS dlya ocenki tekhnogennoj dinamiki landshaftov verhne-yauzskih bolot // Samarskaya Luka: problemy regional'noj i global'noj ekologii. T. 22. № 4. S. 5-13.
3. OOPT RF. Informacionno-spravochnaya sistema. [Elektron. resurs]. URL: http://oopt.info/losiny/index.html (data obrashcheniya 02.03.2025).
4. Predvaritel'nye materialy ocenki vozdejstviya na okruzhayushchuyu sredu po ob"ektu: «Rekonstrukciya avtomobil'noj dorogi ot trassy M-8 «Holmogory» po Vodoprovodnoj allee do ul. Kaliningradskaya v gorodskih okrugah Mytishchi i Korolev». [Elektron. resurs]. URL: https://korolev.ru/reshit-odnu-iz-samyh-sereznyh-problem-korolyova-ogromnye-probki-pomozhet-dopolnitelnyj-vezd-v-gorod/ (data obrashcheniya 22.03.2025).
5. Costanza R., Daly H. 1992. Natural Capital and Sustainable Development // Conservation Biology. No. 6. P. 37-46.
6. De Groot R.S., Fisher B., Christie M., Aronson J., Braat L., Gowdy J., Haines-YoungR., Maltby E., Neuville A., Polasky S., Portela R., Ring I. 2010. Integrating the ecological and economic dimensions in biodiversity and ecosystem service valuation // The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Ecological and Economic Foundations / Ed. P. Kumar. Earthscan, London. R. 9-40.
7. Iniesta-Arandia I., García-Llorente M., Aguilera P., Montes C., Martín-López B. 2014. Socio-cultural valuation of ecosystem services: uncovering the links between values, drivers of change, and human well-being // Ecological Economics. No. 108. P. 36-48.
8. IPCC. Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories [Elektron. resurs]. URL: http://www.ipcc-nggip.iges.or.jp/public/2006gl/index.html (data obrashcheniya 12.03.2025).
9. State of the Voluntary Carbon Markets. Maneuvering the Mosaic. [Elektron. resurs]. URL: https://www.forest-trends.org/publications/maneuvering-the-mosaic-state-of-the-voluntary-carbon-markets-2013/ (data obrashcheniya 23.01.2025).
10. The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity, TEEB. 2008. [Elektron. resurs]. URL: http://www.teebweb.org (data obrashcheniya 25.02.2025).
Review
Рецензент: Ю.В. Трофименко, д-р техн. наук, проф., МАДИ
Views:
51
