HEURISTIC FUNCTION OF INTERCULTURAL PHILOSOPHY

The article considers the problem of the need to transform philosophical ideological foundations in the conditions of acute ideological antagonism in the world. Humanity needs to abandon the dominant European-centric culture. The solution to the problem can be the conscious implementation of a project called "intercultural philosophy". Intercultural philosophy presupposes the need for recognition, cognition and synthesis of the entire spectrum of philosophical traditions that have existed and exist in the world. As a methodology of the cognitive process, a heuristic function is proposed that is able to reformulate the problem, transform cultural experience. The tradition of heuristics (Greek. I find, I open) goes back to Ancient Greek philosophy. In the culture of Modern times, within the framework of non-classical and post-non-classical models of science, non-classical models and algorithms of cognitive activity are proposed. In the middle of the 20th century. Merton actualized the concept of "serendipity" as a methodological heuristic that contributes to the expansion or emergence of a new theory due to random, anomalous, unforeseen facts. K.Popper proposed the principle of falsification as a criterion of the scientific method, as a way to modernize classical theory. I. Lakatos justified the role of the heuristic function in research activities, introduces the concept of "research program", "positive heuristics", "negative heuristics" as a methodology aimed at finding solutions in non-standard situations. The ideas of randomness and insight are now used in mathematics as a formal system model, which is widely used in the technical and technological fields. The methodological approach based on heuristics is legal for any research activity, including the issue of increment of philosophical knowledge proper. The heuristic function in the process of forming an intercultural philosophy, as an innovative worldview model, can become fundamental.

1. List of references

2. Demina N.V. The concept of the ethos of science: Merton and others in search of the social geometry of norms/N.V.Demina//Sociological Journal. – 2005. - No. 4, 185s. pp. 5-47

3. Zubkov V.P. Problems of singularity of social systems/V.P.Zubkov//Car. Road. Infrastructure. – 2021. - №2(28). URL – https://www.adi-madi.ru/madi/article/view/750

4. Kosolapova E.A. Dialogue in hermeneutics H.-G.Gadamer and cultural history/Kosolapova E.A.// Automobile. Road. Infrastructure. – 2021. - №2(28). URL – https://www.adi-madi.ru/madi/article/view/750

5. Lakatos I. Selected works on philosophy and methodology of science/I.Lakatos. – M.: Academic Project, 2008. - 475 p. ISBN 978-5-8291-1049-9

6. Poya D. Mathematical discovery. Problem solving. Basic concepts, study and teaching/Poya D. – M.: KomKniga, 2010. – 450 p. ISBN 978-5-484-01132-2

7. Popper K. Logic of scientific research/K.Popper. – Publishing House: AST, 2010. - 576c. ISBN 978-5-17-066751-2

8. Stepanyants M.T. Intercultural Philosophy. Origins. Methodology. Problems. The prospects//M.T.Stepanyants. – Publishing House:Oriental Literature, 2020. – 192c ISBN 978-5-02-039847-4.

9. Straks M.G. Knowledge as the basis of personal beliefs/M.G. Straks//Car. Road. Infrastructure. – 2018. - №2(16). URL – https://www.adi-madi.ru/madi/article/view/750