Preview

Avtomobil'. Doroga. Infrastruktura.

Advanced search

REVIEW AND ANALYSIS OF DESIGN METHODS FOR FLEXIBLE ROAD PAVEMENTS TO ASSESS THEIR EFFECTIVENESS IN MODERN INTERNATIONAL PRACTICE

Abstract

The modern methodology for designing flexible road pavements began to develop from the simplest techniques based on empirical laws. Quite quickly, international practice moved to the use of semi-empirical methods with various basic theoretical models. Semi-empirical methods have been the most widespread and fairly well tested for many decades. Taking into account the experience gained in their application in a particular country, these methods were corrected, but their theoretical component remained unchanged. Semi-empirical methods compete with mechanical-empirical models that appeared later, which, in addition to calculation, also make it possible to predict indicators of the operational state, allowing verification of engineering solutions for compliance with operational requirements, regulatory rules or customer wishes. It became clear that the future of pavement design would be with mechanical-empirical methods. Restraining their widespread adoption is associated with marketing value, local conservatism and insufficient statistics on the accuracy of forecasting performance indicators. But even in difficult economic conditions, for example, such as in the Syrian Arab Republic, the transition to mechanical-empirical methods of pavement design will provide the greatest efficiency of engineering solutions for flexible road pavements.

About the Authors

Navar Nabil Arous
MADI
Syrian Arab Republic

 postgraduate



Mikhail G. Goryachev
MADI
Russian Federation

Dr. Sc., professor



References

1. Proektirovanie nezhyostkih dorozhnyh odezhd, ODN 218.046-01 (Design of flexible pavements, ODN 218.046-01), Moscow, 2001.

2. Guide for Design of Pavement Structures. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, AASTHO, Washington, DC,1993.

3. Asphalt Institute (MS-1). Thickness Design: Full Depth Asphalt Pavement Structures for Highways and Streets. Asphalt Institute, Lexington, 1970.

4. El-Badawy S. M. et al. Comparison of Idaho pavement design procedure with AASHTO 1993 and MEPDG methods. Transportation and Development Institute Congress 2011, Integrated Transportation and Development for a Better Tomorrow, 2011, pp.586-595.

5. Huang Y. H. Pavement analysis and design. 2nd edition, 2004, pp.475-485.

6. Li Q. et al. Mechanistic-empirical pavement design guide (MEPDG): a bird’s-eye view. Journal of Modern Transportation, 2011,19(2), pp.114-133.

7. Mechanistic–Empirical Pavement Design Guide. A Manual of Practice, American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials executive committee, 2010, 204 р.

8. Neuerungen im Vorschriftenwerk. Richtlinien für die Standardisierung des Oberbaus von Verkehrsflächen, Ausgabe, RStO12, 2012, pp 48.

9. Olidis C., Hein D. Guide for the mechanistic-empirical design of new and rehabilitated pavement structures materials characterization: Is your agency ready. annual conference of the transportation association of Canada, 2004.

10. Papagiannakis A. T., Masad E. A. Pavement design and materials. John Wiley & Sons, 2017, pp 363-370.

11. Richtinienfur dieStandardisierung das Oberbaues von Verkehrsflachen, RSTO 200. FORSCHUNG Geselschaft fur Strassen und VERKEHRWESEN, Ausgabe, BAST, 2000.

12. Scherocman J. A. Pavement design by the asphalt institute method. Ohio Highway Engineering Conference Proceedings, 1970, pp111-115.


Review

Views: 329


ISSN 2409-7217 (Online)