madiАвтомобиль. Дорога. Инфраструктура. = Avtomobil'. Doroga. Infrastruktura.Avtomobil'. Doroga. Infrastruktura.2409-7217МАДИmadi-475Research ArticleБезопасность дорожного движенияRoad safetyАНАЛИЗ «ЗАТРАТЫ-ВЫГОДА» ДЛЯ ОЦЕНКИ ОБЩЕСТВЕННЫХ МЕР И МЕТОДОВ ПОВЫШЕНИЯ БЕЗОПАСНОСТИ ДОРОЖНОГО ДВИЖЕНИЯEVALUATION OF PUBLIC ROAD TRAFFIC SAFETY MEASURES AND METHODS WITH COST-BENEFIT ANALYSISМарковМилен МарчевMarkovMilen M.

аспирант

postgraduate

milen.markov@yahoo.comУниверситет национальной и мировой экономикиБолгарияUniversity of National and World EconomyBulgaria20182903201801(15)88Copyright © Марков М.М., 20182018Марков М.М.Markov M.M.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://www.adi-madi.ru/madi/article/view/475

В данной статье рассмотрены общественные затраты и выгода от реализации мер и методов повышения безопасности дорожного движения. Описан метод оценки их эффективности, основанный на анализе «затраты-выгода». Определена взаимосвязь между политическими решениями в области безопасности дорожного движения, используемыми мерами и методами повышения БДД и достигнутыми результатами. Раскрыто соотношение между сокращением смертности, травматизма и материального ущерба вследствие ДТП и повышением общественного благосостояния.

This article takes a look at public costs and benefits, generated by the application of road traffic safety measures and methods. It describes the cost-benefit analysis approach to evaluating their effectiveness. The article defines the nexus of political decisions concerning road traffic safety, measures taken, methods applied, and results achieved. It elaborates on the correlation between reduced number of dead, injured and material damages, on the one hand, and increased public welfare, on the other.

безопасность дорожного движениядорожно-транспортное происшествиеобщественные затраты и выгодаанализ «затраты-выгода»общественное благосостояниеroad traffic safetyroad traffic accidentpublic cost and benefitcost-benefit analysispublic welfareReferencesAlfaro, J.L. Socioeconomic Cost of Road Accidents: Final Report of Action COST 313. (Eds.) / J.L. Alfaro, M. Chapuis, F. Fabre; Commission of the European Communities. – Brussels, 1994. – 138 p.Alfaro J. L., Chapuis M., Fabre F. Socioeconomic Cost of Road Accidents: Final Report of Action COST 313 (Eds.), Commission of the European Communities, Brussels, 1994, 138 p.Bickel et al. Proposal for Harmonized Guidelines. Developing Harmonized European Approaches for Transport Costing and Project Assessment, Second Edition / Bickel et al; Institut für Energiewirtschaft und Rationelle Energieanwendung (IER). – Stuttgart, Brussels, March 30, 2006. – 149 p.Bickel et al. Proposal for Harmonized Guidelines. Developing Harmonized European Approaches for Transport Costing and Project Assessment, Second Edition, Institut für Energiewirtschaft und Rationelle Energieanwendung (IER), Stuttgart, Brussels, March 30, 2006, 149 p.Elvik, R. Trafikksikkerhetshandbok: Oversikt over virkninger, kostnader og offentlige ansvarsforhold for 124 trafikksikkerhetstiltak / R. Elvik, A.B. Mysen, T. Vaa; Transportokonomisk Institutt. – Oslo, 1997. – 754 s.Elvik R., Mysen A.B., Vaa T. Trafikksikkerhetshandbok: Oversikt over virkninger, kostnader og offentlige ansvarsforhold for 124 trafikksikkerhetstiltak, Transportokonomisk Institutt, Oslo, 1997, 754 p.Framework for the Assessment of Road Safety Measures. Road Safety and Environmental Benefit-Cost and Cost-Effectiveness Analysis for Use in Decision-Making (ROSEBUD) / European Commission. – May, 2006. – 81 p.Framework for the Assessment of Road Safety Measures. Road Safety and Environmental Benefit-Cost and Cost-Effectiveness Analysis for Use in Decision-Making (ROSEBUD), European Commission, May, 2006, 81 p.Haddak, M. Willingness-to-Pay for Road Safety Improvement / M. Haddak, N. Havet, M. Lefevre // Working Papers. GATE Groupe d’Analyse et de Théorie Économique. Lyon‐St Étienne. WP1406. – February, 2014. – 18 p.Haddak M., Havet N., Lefèvre M. Willingness-to-Pay for Road Safety Improvement, Working Papers. GATE Groupe d’Analyse et de Théorie Économique, Lyon‐St Étienne, WP1406, February, 2014, 18 p.Linberg, G. Calculating Transport Accident Cost: Final Report of the Expert Advisors to the High Level Group on Infrastructure Charging / G. Linberg. – Borlänge, Sweden. April 27, 1999. – 53 p.Linberg G. Calculating Transport Accident Cost: Final Report of the Expert Advisors to the High Level Group on Infrastructure Charging, Borlänge, Sweden, April 27, 1999, 53 p.Ray, A. Cost-Benefit Analysis: Issues and Methodologies / A. Ray // A World Bank Publication. – July 1, 1984. – 158 p.Ray A. Cost-Benefit Analysis: Issues and Methodologies, A World Bank Publication, July 1, 1984, 158 p.Road Safety to 2010: Working Paper 7: Estimated Effects of Interventions on Road Safety Outcomes to 2010. Ministry of Transport, Land Transport Safety Authority, New Zealand, Wellington, 2000. – 36 p.Road Safety to 2010: Working Paper 7: Estimated Effects of Interventions on Road Safety Outcomes to 2010, Ministry of Transport, Land Transport Safety Authority, New Zealand, Wellington, 2000, 36 p.Samuelson, P.A. The Pure Theory of Public Expenditure / P.A. Samuelson // The Review of Economics and Statistics. – 1954. – Vol. 36, November. – P. 387–389.Samuelson P.A. The Pure Theory of Public Expenditure, The Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 36, November, 1954, pp. 387–389.Thomas, P. et al. Final Project Report // Road Safety Data, Collection, Transfer and Analysis – DaCoTA Project, co-financed by the European Commission: Directorate General for Mobility and Transport / P. Thomas et al. – Brussels, 2013. – 202 p.Thomas P. et al. Final Project Report, Road Safety Data, Collection, Transfer and Analysis – DaCoTA Project, Co-financed by the European Commission: Directorate General for Mobility and Transport, Brussels, 01.03.2013, 202 p.

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.